Mapademia

This is a rough, field-mix-based estimate, not a precise or complete measure of research quality, timeliness, or impact - it doesn't account for basic vs. applied research, equipment costs, or how new a lab is. Funding always uses each institution's entire tracked funding across all agencies, regardless of the Agency filter above - narrowing to one agency would starve the expected-output side for any institution mostly funded elsewhere, blowing up its ratio (only the Fiscal Year range still applies). It also reflects only the federal agencies tracked here; output (papers/citations) is each institution's entire all-time OpenAlex record, from all funders, not just the federal dollars tracked here, and lags funding by years - so an institution with substantial non-federal or private funding will show a higher Yield than its federal funding alone would predict, and this compares institutions to each other under the same rules, not an exact rate. Institutions with too little expected output to give a stable ratio are left out rather than shown with a wild number. A handful of institutions are registered under more than one recipient ID pointing to the same OpenAlex entity (e.g. Rutgers); their output is apportioned by funding share to avoid double-counting, but some residual distortion can remain - see the Notes tab for the full list and detail.